Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach.
Loading...
Date
2015-07-16
Author(s)
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Affiliation(s)
(Puszka, Nagel, Matthews, Mosca, Bailie) Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia
(Mosca, Bailie) One21seventy, The National Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care, PO Box 10639, Adelaide Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
(Piovesan, Nori) Watto Purrunna Aboriginal Health Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, 1 Gilles Crescent, Hillcrest, SA 5086, Australia
(Mosca, Bailie) One21seventy, The National Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care, PO Box 10639, Adelaide Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
(Piovesan, Nori) Watto Purrunna Aboriginal Health Service, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, 1 Gilles Crescent, Hillcrest, SA 5086, Australia
Year
2015
Citation
International Journal of Mental Health Systems. Vol.9(1), 2015.
Journal
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Conference name
Conference location
Grant information
The authors acknowledge the Lowitja Institute for funding the project.
Abstract
Background: The mental health needs of young people are often inadequately met by health services. Quality improvement approaches provide a framework for measuring, assessing and improving the quality of healthcare. However, a lack of performance standards and measurement tools are an impediment to their implementation. This paper reports on the initial stages of development of a clinical audit tool for assessing the quality of primary healthcare for Australian Indigenous youth aged 12-24 including mental health services provided within primary care. Method(s): Audit items were determined through review of relevant guidelines, expert reference group consensus opinion and specific inclusion criteria. Pilot testing was undertaken at four Indigenous primary healthcare services. A focus group discussion involving five staff from a health service participating in pilot testing explored user experiences of the tool. Result(s): Audit items comprise key measures of processes and outcomes of care for Indigenous youth, as determined by the expert reference group. Gaps and conflicts in relevant guidelines and a lack of agreed performance indicators necessitated a tool development process that relied heavily on expert reference group advice and audit item inclusion criteria. Pilot testing and user feedback highlighted the importance of feasibility and context-specific considerations in tool development and design. Conclusion(s): The youth health audit tool provides a first step in monitoring, assessing and improving the way Indigenous primary healthcare services engage with and respond to the needs of youth. Our approach offers a way forward for further development of quality measures in the absence of clearly articulated standards of care.Copyright © 2015 Puszka et al.
PubMed ID
Type
Article
Study type
Subjects
Mental health
Paediatrics
Paediatrics